edit: confound
Hello all,
I am working on a object classification with a automotive radar point clouds. I compared many models and feature vectors.
Once i used range as feature, all models scored higher f1 in all K validation sets and on the final test set.
One particular artifact of a radar, is that as the farther the object is the less number of points it returns to the radar. Although the performance improved and there is no overfit in the classical sense, i am afraid my model is learning the environment not the class distribuiton and even worse, its learning that big range means big object.
How can i stress test this claim? Should i try to split the data sets so range distribution differs? Or not even using the feature at all and accept lower performance?
Would appreciate your insights.
Thank you.
[link] [留言]